5.4 Reading ahead

Number of replies: 3

girl reading

You don’t have to do any subject-specific reading before you arrive, but students sometimes ask whether we have any suggestions so they can feel better prepared for their first classes.

Whether you’re about to start an undergraduate or postgraduate course with us, any new programme of study will require new types of reading and research. The activities you’ve just worked through should have got you thinking about how you evaluate the information you find on the internet. Eventually, though, you’ll get used to accessing high-quality academic literature from the many journals and other publications that give you cutting-edge insights into the subjects you’ll be studying.

You’ll be expected to use this literature to access some of the most reliable information on a topic, and to help you to develop your ideas and analysis in assignments. The library induction activities you’ll be shown next week are really important - you don’t want to be relying on random internet searches when you begin your first assignments!

If you’re beginning a Master’s degree, this is probably something you’re already used to doing at undergraduate level, and for you it’s all about taking the next step towards developing a deeper appreciation of how to evaluate and integrate others’ information and ideas into your own work.

The best advice we can offer you right now is to become more familiar with how to discover what’s going on in the world around you, and to practice your digital literacy skills by thinking more critically about everything you read and watch. Whatever the level or subject of your course, becoming more engaged with the world around you and how it relates to your studies is a really important aspect of being a good Exeter student. It’s also the route to the highest grades! 

  Activity

Pick a couple of the suggestions below and while reading or watching, start thinking about whether there are alternative viewpoints to be taken into account. Who is the writer or presenter? What’s their background? Do we trust them? Do you agree or disagree with their views? What are you basing your own views on?

Use the Forum at the bottom of the page to start exploring these questions with your peers. To post, simply click 'REPLY.'


Please be aware that any comments and contributions in this forum are open to the general public and NOT just other students in the cohort.
In reply to First post

Re: 5.4 Reading ahead

by Joanna Vajifdar -
BBC - New AI systems collide with copyright law
Writer - Suzanne Bearne, Technology of Business reporter. Would be well-informed on this topic area and the impacts AI has on businesses.
She is more presenting the views and opinions of others, but there is an evident element of dislike and almost hatred throughout the article. I do agree with the anger towards the impact of AI and the lack of laws protecting artists due to the impacts that have been presented through interviews with those that have been impacted by AI.
In reply to First post

Re: 5.4 Reading ahead

by Charlotte Kunz -
The Guardian- The Future of AI
Writer- Jonathan Freedland, Guardian columnist
- I do not fully trust this writer because whilst he is using cited evidence, I am not aware of his possible bias because he provides little information on himself within the article.
- I agree with Freedland's view that AI is daunting and could add to the problems that the modern world is facing. Whilst I do agree with Freedland in that respect, I do think that AI can be used to enhance education to a certain extent and better society.
- I am basing my own views on articles that I have read in the past for argumentative essays that I have written on AI and on past English teachers input that I have heard on the subject.
In reply to First post

Re: 5.4 Reading ahead

by Hannah Faulkner -
Writer - Professor Brent Mittelstadt and Professor Sandra Wachter
Background - They are from the Oxford Internet Institute. This institutes serves as a research hub for information of computer science, technology and communication.
Trustworthy - Considering the high level of data and research which takes place within the institute, it is reasonable to assume that they are qualified and well informed on many aspects of AI and its impact on society (both positive and negative).
Do you agree or disagree with their views? Collectively they are presenting facts and using them to reinforce their concerns of AI. They are, to an extent, criticizing or warning society that these dangers are present and not to focus solely on the future. I do agree with their views as I think it is important to keep a distance and awareness of AI and whilst using it can enhance and become advantageous in some scenarios being careful of its dangers is also incredibly important.
What are you basing your own views on? I am basing my opinions on previous articles and research work which I have undertaken through school work and interest.